AqlData Procurement Insights Desk
Worked Sample · not a solicitation
Counterparty Brief

Mölnlycke Health Care AB

Subject: Mölnlycke Health Care (wound care & surgical) · Gothenburg, Sweden
Source: 60.9M open public-contract award records (OCDS), 68 countries · award winners only
Method: RAW supplier-name resolution · uniqExact(ocid) · cross-feed deduplicated
Prepared: 2026-06-04 · AqlData desk
7,073
Public awards
1,631
Distinct buyers
25
Countries
587
Name variants → 1
Clean
Sanctions (4 lists)
Active
Last award 2026-05-12

01 Footprint Summary

Mölnlycke appears as an awarded supplier in 7,073 distinct public contracts across 25 countries and 1,631 distinct public buyers, with continuous activity from 2005 to a most-recent award on 2026-05-12 (Brazil) — an unambiguous active signal. Counts are distinct OCID; row inflation and cross-feed double-counts removed.

02 Buyer Concentration · award-count basis

Top public buyerCountryAwardsShare
Instituto Português de Oncologia do PortoPT3334.71%
Centro Hospitalar Univ. Lisboa NortePT2243.17%
Departamento de Salud AlcoyES1572.22%
Servicio Salud Occidente (Hospital Bulnes)CL1482.09%
Consellería de Sanidade — SERGASES1191.68%

Top buyer accounts for just 4.71% of awards across 1,631 buyers — a diversified, low-concentration book; no single-customer dependency. Geographic concentration is the notable feature: 30.3% of awards are Portuguese. Shown on award-count basis only — revenue / contract-value share is not derivable from this source (see Methodology).

03 Geographic Distribution

CountryAwardsBuyersEntryLastDirect %
Portugal2,14012820082024*25.0%
Poland1,00432220102022*0.6%
EU (TED)978541201020231.4%
Spain9532202005202415.6%
France58926720062022*0.7%
Chile397962020202678.6%
Italy3111962005202426.7%
Latvia25328201120240.4%
Hungary18075200520243.3%
Sweden17437200620230.0%

Chile flag: 78.6% of Chilean awards are direct (non-competitive) vs a national baseline of 57.4% — a +21pt anomaly worth a question in diligence. Possibly explained by public-hospital emergency-procurement procedure; causation not established. * Last-year value may be a feed-cutoff artefact, not a market exit — confirmed for PT/PL/FR.

04 Temporal Activity

YearAwardsBuyersCountries
201951225018
202055724219
202163225618
202272720818
202355016716
20242558512
2025*170632
2026*762

Peak in 2022 (727 awards). The 2024–2026 decline is under data-lag pressure — several national feeds (PL 2022, PT/FR 2024) cut off in our snapshot, so recent counts understate true activity. The reliable liveness signal is the most-recent award date (BR 2026-05-12, CL 2026-04-07): active. * Lag-affected — not read as a trend.

05 Sanctions & Red-Flag Overlay

WatchlistEntitiesResult
OFAC (US Treasury)19,050No match
UK HM Treasury / FCO9,451No match
EU consolidated1,586No match
UN Security Council875No match

Name and known variants cross-checked against 30,962 sanctioned entities — clean. Scope note: this is a name-level screen of the supplier and its filed variants; it does not trace multi-level subsidiary designations or acquired entities, which require a corporate-registry overlay.

06 Entity Resolution — the work behind the number

Mölnlycke files under 587 distinct raw supplier-name strings across borders — umlaut variants, local legal entities, all-caps forms, Portuguese/Polish/Chilean subsidiaries. A naïve portal search sees a fraction; we collapse all 587 to one identity.

Raw supplier name, as filedAwardsWhy a naïve search misses it
Molnlycke Health Care, S.L675no umlaut
Molnlycke Health Care672no umlaut, generic
Molnlycke Health Care Polska Sp. z o.o.629Polish legal entity
MOLNLYCKE HEALTH CARE COM PROD HOSPITALARES, LDA404Portuguese long form
MOLNLYCKE HEALTH CARE CHILE SPA397Chilean local entity
Mölnlycke Health Care OÜ362Estonian entity (EE/LV/LT)
Mölnlycke Health Care AB214Swedish parent
MOLNLYCKE HEALTH CARE, LDA.213Portuguese local

Naïve search vs. resolver

Portal search for “Mölnlycke”~200–700
Canonical join (misses local entities)~2,000–3,000
AqlData — RAW + cross-feed + umlaut fold7,073

A 10–35× difference. That gap — not the raw records, which are public — is what you are paying for.

07 Methodology & Limits

What this sheet does NOT claim

  • No market share — OCDS covers public contracts only; private-sector revenue is invisible.
  • No contract values / average deal size — values are FX-approximate (±30–60% historical drift) and inflated by framework agreements. Excluded by design.
  • No revenue concentration — only award-count concentration is sound; value-based concentration is not.
  • No win rate / win-loss — OCDS records winners only; bidder-level data does not exist in the source.
  • No 2025–2026 trend — recent years are data-lag affected; we report the last confirmed active date, not a trend.
  • Sanctions = name-level screen — flagged matches always require human confirmation; subsidiary-level designations are out of scope.

All figures are distinct OCID counts from open OCDS data as captured in our snapshot, resolved on raw supplier-name patterns and deduplicated across overlapping national + TED feeds. Public source; the value is the resolution, deduplication and cross-border coverage — not the underlying records.

AqlData — Procurement Insights Desk · desk@data.heyvaql.com · data.heyvaql.com
Worked sample, prepared 2026-06-04. Shared as an illustration of method; not a solicitation and not advice.
Source: open OCDS public-procurement award data (60.9M records, 68 countries). Figures: distinct OCID, award winners only.